1
Return

Aftershock Forecasting

delete2024-07-23
delete5
PRE
AI
J
Jeanne L. Hardebeck *
A
A. L. Llenos
A
Andrew J. Michael
M
M. T. Page
M
Max Schneider
V
van der Elst, Nicholas J.
DOI:10.1146/annurev-earth-040522-102129delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Aftershocks can compound the impacts of a major earthquake, disrupting recovery efforts and potentially further damaging weakened buildings and infrastructure. Forecasts of the probability of aftershocks can therefore aid decision-making during earthquake response and recovery. Several countries issue authoritative aftershock forecasts. Most aftershock forecasts are based on simple statistical models that were first developed in the 1980s and remain the best available models.We review these statistical models and the wide-ranging research to advance aftershock forecasting through better statistical, physical, and machine-learning methods. Physics-based forecasts based on mainshock stress changes can sometimes match the statistical models in testing but do not yet outperform them. Physical models are also hampered by unsolved problems such as the mechanics of dynamic triggering and the influence of background conditions. Initial work on machine-learning forecasts shows promise, and new machine-learning earthquake catalogs provide an opportunity to advance all types of aftershock forecasts. Several countries issue real-time aftershock forecasts following significant earthquakes, providing information to aid response and recovery. Statistical models based on past aftershocks are used to compute aftershock probability as a function of space, time, and magnitude. Aftershock forecasting is advancing through better statistical models, constraints on physical triggering mechanisms, and machine learning. Large high-resolution earthquake catalogs provide an opportunity to advance physical, statistical, and machine-learning aftershock models.
Keywords:
aftershocks
forecasting
earthquake statistics
stress triggering
earthquake sequences
earthquake forecasting

Journal

Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences cover
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
IF:
13
Papers:
899
Citations:
1.1W

Organization

U
United States Department of the Interior
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 226
United States Geological Survey cover
United States Geological Survey
Scholars:
9.2K
Papers: 7.5K
Citations: 1.8W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers