.png){kind=icon}
Return
Agentic inequality
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1038/s42256-026-01318-5.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
As autonomous AI agents capable of complex planning and action are deployed more widely, differences in who can access them, how capable they are and how many of them users can deploy are likely to shape the distribution of power and outcomes at a societal level. We characterize these disparities as agentic inequality. We argue that agents could either deepen existing divides or, under the right conditions, mitigate them. The Perspective makes three contributions. First, it develops a framework for analysing agentic inequality across three dimensions—availability, quality and quantity. Second, it argues that agentic inequality is not the same as earlier technological divides because AI agents function as autonomous delegates (rather than tools) and so generate new asymmetries through scalable goal delegation and direct agent-to-agent competition. Third, it analyses the technical, socioeconomic and political drivers of agentic inequality, such as model release strategies and market incentives, that are likely to shape the distribution of agentic power. We conclude by setting out a research agenda for governance. Sharp et al. investigate the implications of unequal access to AI agents and of differences in their quality and number, developing a conceptual framework to identify potential sources of inequality and suggesting a research agenda to help address the resulting societal challenge.
Journal
IF:
23.9
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
1.8W
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSave
ShareSave
ShareSaveConcentrating intelligence: scaling and market structure in artificial intelligence*.png)
ECONOMIC POLICY
ECONOMIC POLICYIF6.4
PREAI
ShareSave
View more