arrow
Return

An efficient method for robust projection matrix design

delete2018-02-01
delete26
delete
OA
AI
T
Tao Hong *
Z
Zhihui Zhu
DOI:10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.09.007delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Our objective is to efficiently design a robust projection matrix Phi for the Compressive Sensing (CS) systems when applied to the signals that are not exactly sparse. The optimal projection matrix is obtained by mainly minimizing the average coherence of the equivalent dictionary. In order to drop the requirement of the sparse representation error (SRE) for a set of training data as in [15,16], we introduce a novel penalty function independent of a particular SRE matrix. Without requiring of training data, we can efficiently design the robust projection matrix and apply it for most of CS systems, like a CS system for image processing with a conventional wavelet dictionary in which the SRE matrix is generally not available. Simulation results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach compared with the state-of-the-art methods. In addition, we experimentally demonstrate with natural images that under similar compression rate, a CS system with a learned dictionary in high dimensions outperforms the one in low dimensions in terms of reconstruction accuracy. This together with the fact that our proposed method can efficiently work in high dimension suggests that a CS system can be potentially implemented beyond the small patches in sparsity-based image processing. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Robust projection matrix
Sparse representation error (SRE)
High dimensional dictionary
Mutual coherence
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Signal Processing cover
Signal Processing
IF:
3.6
Papers:
9.9K
Citations:
1.7W

Organization

C
Colorado School of Mines
Scholars:
5.6K
Papers: 5.5K
Citations: 1.0W
T
Technion Israel Institute of Technology
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 2.0W