.png){kind=icon}
Return
Analyzing complexity in risk
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01111.x.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
When risks generate anger rather than fear, there is at least someone who regards the imposition of those risks as wrongdoing; and it then makes sense to speak of the involvement in producing those risks as complicity. It is particularly relevant to examine the complicity of risk bearers, because this is likely to have a strong influence on how far other actors should go in providing them with protection. This article makes a case for analyzing complicity explicitly, in parallel with normal processes of risk assessment, and proposes a framework for this analysis. It shows how it can be applied in a case study of maritime transportation, and examines the practical and theoretical difficulties of this kind of analysis. The conclusion is that the analysis has to be formative rather than summative, but that it could provide a useful way of exposing differences in the assumptions of different actors about agency and responsibility.
Keywords:
Agency
benefit
causation
complicity
voluntarism
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.3
Papers:
5.6K
Citations:
1.2W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
Variants in the DYX2 locus are associated with altered brain activation in reading-related brain regions in subjects with reading disability.png)
NeuroImage
OAAI
NeuroImageIF0
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveProcess and layout dependent substrate resistance modeling for deep sub-micron ESD protection devices2000 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 38th Annual (Cat. No.00CH37059)
2000 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 38th Annual (Cat. No.00CH37059)IF0
PREAI
ShareSave
ShareSave
View more