1
Return

Artificial intelligence in drug discovery — what it is, where we stand and the path forward

delete2026-08-07
delete0
PRE
AI
A
Andreas Bender *
M
Morgan Thomas
J
Jack W. Scannell
D
David A. Shaywitz
G
Gian Marco Ghiandoni
J
Joe G. Greener
L
Lavinia-Lorena Pruteanu
R
Rachel DeVay Jacobson
K
Koichi Handa
S
Srijit Seal
M
Manas Mahale
M
Marco Schmidt
T
Tim Ahfeldt
F
Francesca Grisoni
I
Isidro Cortés-Ciriano
DOI:10.1038/s41573-026-01496-2delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Artificial intelligence (AI) in drug discovery has attracted increasing interest over the past decade. It is now time for a critical review of progress in the field: where did we advance — and where are we yet to see impact — when it comes to what matters in drug discovery, which is to deliver safer and more efficacious medicines to patients faster? Although a wide variety of AI methods have been developed, applied and benchmarked, evidence of their clinically relevant impact is, so far, disappointingly limited. In this Perspective we discuss potential reasons, including an insufficient focus on clinical translation during model development, difficulties with applying AI algorithms on conditional life science data, and insufficient problem definitions and the resulting underspecification of computational models for real-world use cases. ‘Technology push’ compared with ‘science pull’ is also likely to be an underlying factor, as well as the substantial time required to operationalize technical capabilities into systems that are sufficiently scaled and accessible for users. We provide recommendations for the development of AI in drug discovery with the aim of increasing its translational relevance. For example, benchmarking studies of AI tools in drug discovery need to move on from model validation and instead focus on their ability to improve decision making. Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in drug discovery have attracted high interest in recent years, but evidence for clinically relevant impact so far is limited. This Perspective discusses potential reasons, including an insufficient focus on clinical translation during model development and difficulties with applying AI algorithms on conditional life science data, and provides recommendations for the development of AI in drug discovery.

Journal

Nature Reviews Drug Discovery cover
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
IF:
101.8
Papers:
5.1K
Citations:
5.3W

Organization

V
valid inc.
Scholars:
2
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
K
Khalifa University of Science and Technology
Scholars:
1.2K
Papers: 557
Citations: 4
European Bioinformatics Institute cover
European Bioinformatics Institute
Scholars:
1.1K
Papers: 604
Citations: 1.4W
M
medical research council
Scholars:
28
Papers: 16
Citations: 0
U
university of cambridge
Scholars:
6.8K
Papers: 3.2K
Citations: 3
H
harvard medical school
Scholars:
4.6K
Papers: 2.1K
Citations: 2
A
axcelead tokyo west partners inc.
Scholars:
3
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
A
astrazeneca
Scholars:
3.0K
Papers: 785
Citations: 172
U
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 1.5W
P
powerhouse biology inc.
Scholars:
2
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
B
biotx.ai gmbh
Scholars:
2
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
U
University of Edinburgh
Scholars:
5.1W
Papers: 4.5W
Citations: 70
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers