.png){kind=icon}
Return
Artificial Intelligence
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1097/SLA.0000000000006464.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
We have assessed the chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer, a type of artificial intelligence software designed to simulate conversations with human users, in an experiment designed to test its relevance to scientific writing. chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer could become a promising and powerful tool for tasks such as automated draft generation, which may be useful in academic activities to make writing work faster and easier. However, the use of this tool in scientific writing raises some ethical concerns and therefore there have been calls for it to be regulated. It may be difficult to recognize whether an abstract or paper is written by a chatbot or a human being because chatbots use advanced techniques, such as natural language processing and machine learning, to generate text that is similar to human writing. To detect the author is a complex task and requires thorough critical reading to reach a conclusion. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to explore the pros and cons of the use of chatbots in scientific writing.
Keywords:
artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
chatbot generative pretrained transformer
Journal
IF:
6.4
Papers:
1.1W
Citations:
5.5W
Organization
Cited Papers
The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: A case study of cancers in Scotland.png)
PLOS ONE
OAAI
PLOS ONEIF0
OAAIShareSaveComparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewersNPJ DIGITAL MEDICINEOAAI
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINEIF15.1
OAAIShareSaveLiver Transplantation and Hepatic Resection can Achieve Cure for Hepatocellular CarcinomaANNALS OF SURGERY
ANNALS OF SURGERYIF6.4
PREAI
ShareSaveNonhuman Authors and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge
OAAI
OAAIShareSaveShareSave
View more