arrow
Return

Assessing the Efficiency and Quality of Audio-Coding Versus Transcript Coding

delete2026-05-01
delete0
PRE
AI
L
Long, Katrina M.
P
Pu, Dai *
B
Bonnici, Rachel
R
Robins, Lauren M.
G
Greer, Kathryn
M
Mitchell, Debra
P
Palmer, Katie
A
Annette Peart
B
Bernice Redley
C
Cylie Williams
H
Haines, Terry
DOI:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000893delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background: Manual transcription can be resource-consuming and time-consuming, while software-based audio coding offers a potentially cheaper and faster alternative. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the time efficiency, cost effectiveness, and researcher experience of thematic analysis of audio recordings versus transcripts. Methods: This was a mixed-methods crossover study with two conditions (audio coding and transcript coding) and three categories of coders (novice, competent, and expert). Ten researchers coded 18 interview segments using NVivo, half in each format. Demographics, coding times, and coding experiences were collected. Results: On average, transcript coding took less time than audio coding, and NVivo experience was negatively associated with coding time across conditions. Economic analysis showed that audio was <60% the cost of transcript coding. Audio coding was perceived as being more difficult, yet coders agreed that both methods led to similar code quality. Audio coding may be a cost-saving alternative to transcript coding. Discussion: The potential cost savings, coupled with the more "naturalistic" source of audio data, may make audio coding an appropriate approach to consider for the qualitative researcher, despite coder perceptions of its greater difficulty. Audio coding should be considered as part of a qualitative project to enhance immersion in the data or improve coding efficiency. However, this approach should be preceded by careful consideration of the most effective computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software and extensive training and familiarization with audio coding procedures before analysis.
Keywords:
audio data
computer-assisted data analysis
economic analysis
qualitative data analysis
thematic analysis

Journal

N
Nursing Research
IF:
2.2
Papers:
1.0K
Citations:
0

Organization

P
Peninsula Health
Scholars:
391
Papers: 215
Citations: 308
M
monash university
Scholars:
9.1K
Papers: 4.1K
Citations: 0
D
Deakin University
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 2.8W
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Expediting the Analysis of Qualitative Data in Evaluation
err2014-05-27
err0
PREAI
errJennifer Watling Neal; Zachary P. Neal; Erika VanDyke; Mariah Kornbluh
errShare
errSave
Monitoring implementation in program evaluation with direct audio coding
err2020-12-01
err0
PREAI
errFarley,Jennifer; Duppong Hurley,Kristin; Aitken,A. Angelique
errShare
errSave
Hearing voices: Comparing two methods for analysis of focus group data
err2017-06-01
err0
PREAI
errMelanie Greenwood; Tina Kendrick; Hugh Davies; Fenella J. Gill
errShare
errSave
Using thematic analysis in psychology
err2006-01-01
err0
PREAI
errVirginia Braun; Victoria Clarke
errShare
errSave
The Digital Revolution in Qualitative Research: Working with Digital Audio Data through Atlas. Ti
err2005-06-01
err0
errOAAI
errWill Gibson; Peter Callery; Malcolm Campbell; Andy Hall; Dave Richards
errShare
errSave
researcher View more