.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Assessing UAV imagery and high-resolution LiDAR for tree height estimation: The role of flight speed and image overlap
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
P
H
DOI：10.1016/j.srs.2026.100448.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Tree height is a fundamental attribute in ecological research and commercial forestry, serving as a key indicator of site productivity. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with RGB cameras and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensors offer a cost- and time-efficient alternative to traditional field-based, satellite, and manned aircraft methods for tree height measurement. The objectives of this study are: (1) to evaluate the effects of UAV flight speed and image overlap on data quality, mission efficiency, and processing requirements; (2) to compare the performance of Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry and LiDAR in generating canopy height models (CHMs); and (3) to quantify the accuracy of UAV-derived tree height estimates relative to field measurements and identify optimal flight configurations. Three flight speeds (10, 15, and 20 mph) and four forward/side overlap levels (50%, 60%, 70%, and 80%) were tested, with UAV-derived height estimates validated against 920 field-measured trees. Both datasets were processed in ArcGIS Pro to produce CHMs, RGB imagery via SfM photogrammetry, and LiDAR data from laser-scanned point clouds. Orthomosaic quality was assessed using tie point density, reprojection error, ground resolution, image georeferencing deviation, Global Positioning System (GPS) root mean squared error (RMSE), and block adjustment success, while LiDAR point cloud quality was evaluated using point density (pts/m2) and height percentiles (P25, P50, P75, P95). Height estimation accuracy for both sensors was quantified using the coefficient of determination (R2), RMSE, and Bias. Results indicate that image overlap exerted a stronger and more consistent influence than flight speed across all dimensions of mission efficiency, data volume, and processing time. Flight duration more than doubled and image counts increased sixfold when overlap increased from 50:50 to 80:80. Higher overlaps improved orthomosaic continuity, tie point density, reprojection accuracy, and CHM quality, though at the cost of longer processing times, greater storage demands, and increased computational requirements. LiDAR point density similarly increased with overlap, yielding smoother CHMs at ≥70% overlap, while height percentiles remained stable across configurations. In terms of accuracy, UAV imagery at 10 mph with 80:80 overlap achieved the best photogrammetric performance (R2 ≈ 0.60, RMSE = 4.5 m, Bias = 4.3 m), though all imagery-derived estimates exhibited systematic height underestimation. LiDAR-derived heights were substantially more robust across all flight configurations, with the best performance at 10 mph and 80:80 overlap (R2 ≈ 0.89, RMSE <1.5 m, Bias <0.5 m). These findings demonstrate that higher overlap, particularly at moderate flight speeds, substantially enhances data quality and tree height estimation accuracy, offering practical guidance for optimizing UAV-based forest inventory workflows.
Keywords:
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR)
UAV imagery
Canopy height model (CHM)
Site productivity
Tree height estimation
Forest management
Journal
IF:
5.2
Papers:
457
Citations:
980
Organization
Cited Papers