arrow
Return

Associative learning shapes visual discrimination in a web-based classical conditioning task

delete2021-08-03
delete7
delete
OA
AI
Y
Yannik Stegmann *
M
Marta Andreatta
P
Paul Pauli
M
Matthias J. Wieser
DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-95200-6delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Threat detection plays a vital role in adapting behavior to changing environments. A fundamental function to improve threat detection is learning to differentiate between stimuli predicting danger and safety. Accordingly, aversive learning should lead to enhanced sensory discrimination of danger and safety cues. However, studies investigating the psychophysics of visual and auditory perception after aversive learning show divergent findings, and both enhanced and impaired discrimination after aversive learning have been reported. Therefore, the aim of this web-based study is to examine the impact of aversive learning on a continuous measure of visual discrimination. To this end, 205 participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm before and after completing a visual discrimination task using differently oriented grating stimuli. Participants saw either unpleasant or neutral pictures as unconditioned stimuli (US). Results demonstrated sharpened visual discrimination for the US-associated stimulus (CS+), but not for the unpaired conditioned stimuli (CS-). Importantly, this finding was irrespective of the US's valence. These findings suggest that associative learning results in increased stimulus salience, which facilitates perceptual discrimination in order to prioritize attentional deployment.
Keywords:
SINGLE NEURONS
ATTENTION
FEAR
CORTEX
PERCEPTION
PLASTICITY
THREAT
UNCERTAINTY
INTOLERANCE
STIMULUS
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Scientific Reports cover
Scientific Reports
IF:
3.9
Papers:
27.8W
Citations:
83.5W

Organization

E
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 2.4W
U
University of Wurzburg
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 2.5W