1
Return

Augmented Reality in Forestry: Current Capabilities, Limitations, and Future Directions

delete2026-07-23
delete0
delete
OA
AI
F
Felipe de Miguel-Díez *
A
Alberto Udali
F
Francesco Latterini
F
Frederico Tupinambá‐Simões
P
P. L. Chambers
K
Karol Tomczak
Z
Zennure Uçar
R
Raquel Lobo‐do‐Vale
Y
Yannik Wardius
F
Funda Yildirim
E
Ebru Bilici
E
Emilia Tcherkezova
F
Felipe Bravo
O
Oleksandr Soshenskyi
S
Safia El-Alami
L
Lukas Stopfer
M
Martino Rogai
P
Pedro Caldas Britto
M
Milutin Milenković
A
Avinash Shanmugam
A
Alexander Kaulen
M
Mauricio Acuña
T
Thomas Purfürst
DOI:10.1007/s40725-026-00283-xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This semi-systematic review examines how augmented reality (AR) was developed and applied in forestry between 2000 and 2025. With a European focus and international scope, it integrates peer-reviewed literature, grey literature, and commercially available tools to capture progress and practice. It maps AR use cases, characterises hardware, software, and data pipelines, assesses Technology Readiness Levels, and identifies barriers, research gaps, and priorities for future deployment. AR in forestry is moving from isolated prototypes towards early operational implementation. The most mature applications are found in forest inventory, urban forestry, and roundwood measurement, where smartphone- and tablet-based tools using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), Red, Green, Blue, and Depth (RGB-D) sensing, Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping (SLAM), and computer vision have reached moderate to high readiness, with some commercially deployed. Head-mounted displays and machine-integrated systems are being tested for stand visualisation, digital tree marking, planting guidance, and harvesting support, but most remain at pilot stage. Most systems cluster around TRL 4–6, while only a limited subset reaches TRL 7–9. AR in forestry is a heterogeneous but rapidly evolving ecosystem of mobile, wearable, and machine-integrated solutions. Persistent barriers include under-canopy tracking instability, weak georeferencing, limited ruggedness and battery life, ergonomic constraints, poor interoperability, and limited validation. AR nevertheless shows strong potential as a human-centred interface, but wider deployment will require forest-adapted localisation, lightweight 3D visualisation, stronger system integration, and closer collaboration across stakeholders.
Keywords:
Geospatial technologies
Human–computer interaction
Remote sensing integration
Natural resources management
Mixed reality applications
Smart forestry
User-centred design
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Current Forestry Reports cover
Current Forestry Reports
IF:
7.2
Papers:
276
Citations:
2.2K

Organization

F
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology
Scholars:
9
Papers: 8
Citations: 0
I
Institute of Dendrology
Scholars:
22
Papers: 18
Citations: 592
S
School of Forest Sciences
Scholars:
37
Papers: 17
Citations: 0
D
dereli vocational school
Scholars:
3
Papers: 2
Citations: 0
N
Natural Resources Institute Finland
Scholars:
200
Papers: 102
Citations: 4.1K
F
faculty of forestry
Scholars:
49
Papers: 25
Citations: 0
D
Department of Land
Scholars:
48
Papers: 27
Citations: 2
U
university of twente
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 9
S
school of agriculture
Scholars:
97
Papers: 140
Citations: 2
N
national research council of italy
Scholars:
1.1K
Papers: 393
Citations: 0
I
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Scholars:
242
Papers: 144
Citations: 9.6K
N
national institute of geophysics
Scholars:
11
Papers: 6
Citations: 0
F
forestry department
Scholars:
8
Papers: 6
Citations: 0
D
department timber supply and data management
Scholars:
2
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
U
university of freiburg
Scholars:
3.0K
Papers: 1.1K
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers