.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Automated Machine Learning in Action: Performance Evaluation for Predictive Analytics Tasks
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.18267/j.aip.288.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Background: As organizations increasingly seek data-driven insights, the demand for machine learning (ML) expertise outpaces the current workforce supply. Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) frameworks help close this gap by streamlining the ML pipeline, making advanced modeling accessible to non-specialists. Objective: This study evaluates the performance of four open-source AutoML frameworks-Auto-Keras, Auto-Sklearn, H2O, and TPOT-in predictive analytics, focusing on both binary and multiclass classification. The goal is to identify performance strengths and limitations under varying dataset conditions and propose improvements for framework optimization. Methods: Quantitative experimental research design was employed. 22 publicly available datasets were selected from established benchmarking sources, covering diverse predictive analytics challenges. Framework performance was assessed across twelve data segments, defined by characteristics such as sample size, feature count, and categorical feature proportion. Evaluation metrics included AUC for binary and accuracy/F1 for multiclass classification tasks, with standardized runtime constraints applied to ensure comparability. Results: The findings show that H2O delivered strong results across diverse datasets, particularly for binary classification. However, no single framework achieved superior performance across all data segments. Auto-Sklearn performed well in multiclass classification, especially with higher feature counts, while Auto-Keras and TPOT demonstrated variable outcomes depending on dataset complexity. Performance declined notably in scenarios with high categorical proportions, severe class imbalance, or extensive missingvalues. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that AutoML frameworks can substantially support predictive analytics but exhibit distinct strengths and limitations under specific data conditions. While H2O proved most robust overall, targeted refinements such as enhancing feature selection in Auto-Keras and improving categorical variable handling in Auto-Sklearn could further optimize performance. The findings provide actionable insights for both practitioners selecting frameworks and developers enhancing AutoML design, highlighting the need for ongoing innovation to ensure adaptability to complex predictive analytics tasks.
Keywords:
AutoML frameworks
Performance benchmarking
Predictive analytics
Binaryand multiclass classification
Model interpretability
Journal
A
IF:
1.1
Papers:
15
Citations:
0