Return
Automatic First Arrival Picking via Deep Learning With Human Interactive Learning
DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2019.2946118.png)
Abstract
En 中文
First break picking is an inevitable process in land seismic data processing, which involves a huge amount of human labor to perform. Even after decades of investigation on the first break picking process, there are still enormous challenges in developing a robust automatic approach. Although many experts proposed techniques to solve the first break picking problems automatically, there are no solid solutions to avoid human labors during the picking process. In the late 20th century, the rise of the artificial intelligence and the advancement of computer hardware have overcome some challenges in first break picking but the level of their success is limited. In this article, we proposed a deep machine learning model to achieve automatic seismic first break picking. Our proposed model can find the underlying factors and determine the first break curve. In addition, the network is capable of updating itself through continuous learning. The system is able to identify labeling anomalies on-site and update the model through active learning. Unfortunately, training the machine learning model on a huge data set that contains unnecessary data points is an inefficient way for both model learning process and human labeling labors. Therefore, training the model with data selected by the experts can highly reduce the training time and the number of data that human has to label. In simulation, we show the advantage of our proposed deep semisupervised neural network, which uses both labeled and unlabeled data sets to achieve higher accuracy compared with the supervised neural networks.
Keywords:
Data models
Training
Deep learning
Task analysis
Data preprocessing
Deep learning
first arrival picking
image processing
machine learning
neural network
segmentation
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
8.6
Papers:
2.1W
Citations:
10.7W

