arrow
Return

Backbone extraction through statistical edge filtering: A comparative study

delete2025-01-03
delete2
delete
OA
AI
A
Ali Yassin *
H
Hocine Cherifi
H
Hamida Seba
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0316141delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The backbone extraction process is pivotal in expediting analysis and enhancing visualization in network applications. This study systematically compares seven influential statistical hypothesis-testing backbone edge filtering methods (Disparity Filter (DF), Polya Urn Filter (PF), Marginal Likelihood Filter (MLF), Noise Corrected (NC), Enhanced Configuration Model Filter (ECM), Global Statistical Significance Filter (GloSS), and Locally Adaptive Network Sparsification Filter (LANS)) across diverse networks. A similarity analysis reveals that backbones extracted with the ECM and DF filters exhibit minimal overlap with backbones derived from their alternatives. Interestingly, ordering the other methods from GloSS to NC, PF, LANS, and MLF, we observe that each method's output encapsulates the backbone of the previous one. Correlation analysis between edge features (weight, degree, betweenness) and the test significance level reveals that the DF and LANS filters favor high-weighted edges while ECM assigns them lower significance to edges with high degrees. Furthermore, the results suggest a limited influence of the edge betweenness on the filtering process. The backbones global properties analysis (edge fraction, node fraction, weight fraction, weight entropy, reachability, number of components, and transitivity) identifies three typical behavior types for each property. Notably, the LANS filter preserves all nodes and weight entropy. In contrast, DF, PF, ECM, and GloSS significantly reduce network size. The MLF, NC, and ECM filters preserve network connectivity and weight entropy. Distribution analysis highlights the PU filter's ability to capture the original weight distribution. NC filter closely exhibits a similar capability. NC and MLF filters excel for degree distribution. These insights offer valuable guidance for selecting appropriate backbone extraction methods based on specific properties.
Keywords:
CONNECTOMES

Journal

PLoS One cover
PLoS One
IF:
2.6
Papers:
2.6W
Citations:
81.6W

Organization

No organization information available
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

The distance backbone of complex networks
err2021-10-20
err0
errOAAI
errTiago Simas; Rion Brattig Correia; Luis M Rocha
errShare
errSave
Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention
err2022-09-21
err0
errOAAI
errK. Hunter Wapman; Sam Zhang; Aaron Clauset; Daniel B. Larremore
errShare
errSave
The architecture of complex weighted networks
err2004-03-08
err3.2K
errOAAI
errBarrat, A; Barthélemy, M; Pastor-Satorras, R; Vespignani, A
errShare
errSave
An evaluation tool for backbone extraction techniques in weighted complex networks
err2023-10-09
err4
errOAAI
errYassin, Ali; Haidar, Abbas; Cherifi, Hocine; Seba, Hamida; Togni, Olivier
errShare
errSave
On human social intelligence
err1988-10-01
err0
PREAI
errL FREEMAN; S FREEMAN; A MICHAELSON
errShare
errSave
Backbone: An R package for extracting the backbone of bipartite projections
err2021-01-06
err0
errOAAI
errRachel Domagalski; Zachary P. Neal; Bruce Sagan
errShare
errSave
Inferring monopartite projections of bipartite networks: an entropy-based approach
err2017-05-17
err0
errOAAI
errFabio Saracco; Mika J Straka; Riccardo Di Clemente; Andrea Gabrielli; Guido Caldarelli; Tiziano Squartini
errShare
errSave
On community structure in complex networks: challenges and opportunities
err2019-12-16
err0
errOAAI
errHocine Cherifi; Gergely Palla; Boleslaw K. Szymanski; Xiaoyan Lu
errShare
errSave
researcher View more