.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Behavioural deception
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/0169-5347(96)20068-0.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Theoretical models predict that deception should occur even in stable signalling systems. Assessment of the prevalence of deception and its importance has, however, been hampered by the lack of a rigorous definition of what constitutes deception and by the anecdotal nature of much of the literature, For an interaction to qualify as deception, the receiver of the 'deceptive' signal must incur a cost. While this cost is often clear in interspecific interactions, it is more difficult to evaluate in interactions between members of the same species. A systematic approach to the study of deception, including the use of experimental techniques to elicit deceptive behaviour, is now required. Such an approach may enable us to address a crucial question in social evolution - whether animals are capable of manipulating the minds of others, or merely their behaviour.
Keywords:
FLYCATCHER FICEDULA-HYPOLEUCA
MALE BLUEGILL SUNFISH
PIED FLYCATCHER
TACTICAL DECEPTION
BOLAS SPIDERS
EVOLUTION
MIMICRY
HYPOTHESIS
SELECTION
MATE
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
T
IF:
17.3
Papers:
4.4K
Citations:
4.0W
Organization
No organization information available