arrow
Return

Behind the Scenes of Participation: Ethical Reflections on Power Dynamics in Co-Designing a VR Program in Long-Term Care

delete2026-03-20
delete0
delete
OA
AI
J
J. Tze‐Fei Wong
K
Karen Lok Yi Wong
A
Albin Soni
M
Mary Anne Van
S
Sena Kholmatov
K
K. Lee
J
Jim Mann
A
Angelica Lim
W
W. Ben Mortenson
L
Lillian Hung
DOI:10.1177/16094069261430201delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
<jats:sec> <jats:title>Introduction</jats:title> <jats:p>Participatory research (PR) has been found to have a positive impact on people living in long-term care (LTC). Yet, limited attention has been paid to the ethical complexities that are encountered in the research process. Our paper offers a reflexive account of the ethical issues related to power dynamics in a PR study involving the co-design of a virtual reality (VR) program in LTC.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>This reflection is part of a larger study to co-design a VR program in LTC settings. Our interdisciplinary team consists of an older adult with dementia, students and researchers in nursing, rehabilitation science, social work, computer science and engineering. We critically reflect on PR processes: co-design workshops, residents-led co-creation of videos, and staff-led VR implementation. We discussed the power dynamics faced, the methodological insights and lessons learned. A thematic analysis was conducted based on data drawn from fieldnotes, reflective memos, and team meeting discussions to identify recurring patterns related to power dynamics and participation.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>We identified the following themes: 1) the unintentional exclusion of residents’ voices in co-creation, 2) perceived autonomy and different levels of knowledge regarding VR technology, and 3) unfamiliarity with the research team and process.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Our results underscore the fragility of inclusive engagement in PR. We summarized the lessons learned with the acronym - PARTNER to guide future PR and projects co-designing and implementing technological interventions in LTC to promote more inclusive participation. We argue that genuine participatory practice requires ongoing reflexivity on power dynamics, attention to structural constraints, and care for relational dynamics in LTC settings.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Keywords:
Participatory research
Power dynamics
Virtual reality
Long-term care
Co-design

Journal

I
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
IF:
3.8
Papers:
2.1K
Citations:
1.2W

Organization

C
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 5.6W
S
simon fraser university
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 746
Citations: 0
U
University of British Columbia
Scholars:
6.9W
Papers: 6.1W
Citations: 8.6W
researcher View more organizations