1
Return

Beyond Waste Utilization: Evidence Boundaries and Receiving-Soil Suitability for Phosphogypsum Land Application

delete2026-08-13
delete0
delete
OA
AI
W
Wanzhu Xi
X
Xiangyu Xu *
X
Xian Zhang
J
Jianing Wang
L
Lulu Yue
S
Shujun Zhao
H
Han Wang
Y
Yanghua Liu
DOI:10.3390/su18168245delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Phosphogypsum (PG), a gypsum-rich by-product of wet-process phosphoric acid production, is increasingly considered for land application because it can supply calcium and sulfur and alleviate constraints such as sodicity, subsoil acidity, and vegetation establishment limitations. However, PG may also contain residual acidity, soluble salts, fluoride, heavy metals, and naturally occurring radionuclides, creating multiple exposure pathways. This critical review distinguishes direct PG evidence from gypsum or sulfate analogue evidence, life cycle assessment/material flow analysis evidence, and risk control studies. It evaluates PG land application according to receiving soil conditions, diagnosed constraints, exposure pathways, and environmental safety boundaries. The strongest evidence supports use in diagnosed sodic and saline–sodic soils, whereas applications in Al-toxic acid subsoils, flooded paddy systems, contaminated or degraded soils, and non-food vegetated systems require conditional assessment. PG should therefore be treated as a context-specific management option rather than an unrestricted disposal route. By linking waste valorization with soil demand, source quality, exposure control, and long-term monitoring, the proposed framework contributes to sustainability by integrating circular resource use with soil health, water protection, food/feed safety, and risk-informed governance, while helping to prevent the transfer of environmental burdens across ecosystems or generations.
Keywords:
phosphogypsum
land application
soil contact reuse
receiving soil context
evidence boundaries
saline–sodic soils
non-food vegetated systems
fluoride
radionuclides
decision framework

Journal

Sustainability cover
Sustainability
IF:
3.3
Papers:
10.5W
Citations:
28.4W

Organization

H
Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Scholars:
2.0K
Papers: 1.0K
Citations: 1.6K
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers