arrow
Return

Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?

delete2024-03-01
delete70
delete
OA
AI
C
Caleb Ziems *
W
William A. Held
O
Omar Ahmed Shaikh
J
Jiaao Chen
Z
Zhehao Zhang
D
Diyi Yang
DOI:10.1162/coli_a_00502delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Large language models (LLMs) are capable of successfully performing many language processing tasks zero-shot (without training data). If zero-shot LLMs can also reliably classify and explain social phenomena like persuasiveness and political ideology, then LLMs could augment the computational social science (CSS) pipeline in important ways. This work provides a road map for using LLMs as CSS tools. Towards this end, we contribute a set of prompting best practices and an extensive evaluation pipeline to measure the zero-shot performance of 13 language models on 25 representative English CSS benchmarks. On taxonomic labeling tasks (classification), LLMs fail to outperform the best fine-tuned models but still achieve fair levels of agreement with humans. On free-form coding tasks (generation), LLMs produce explanations that often exceed the quality of crowdworkers' gold references. We conclude that the performance of today's LLMs can augment the CSS research pipeline in two ways: (1) serving as zero-shot data annotators on human annotation teams, and (2) bootstrapping challenging creative generation tasks (e.g., explaining the underlying attributes of a text). In summary, LLMs are posed to meaningfully participate in social science analysis in partnership with humans.
Keywords:
STANCE DETECTION
PERSONALITY
CULTURE
EVENTS
MEDIA
PERSUASION
EXTRACTION
IDENTITY
DECISION
STYLES

Journal

Computational Linguistics cover
Computational Linguistics
IF:
5.3
Papers:
837
Citations:
2.7K

Organization

G
Georgia Institute of Technology
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 5.9W
S
Stanford University
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.2W
Citations: 17.0W
U
university system of georgia
Scholars:
7.3W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 101
researcher View more organizations