arrow
Return

Capturing Tacit Knowledge in Security Operation Centers

delete2020-01-01
delete19
delete
OA
AI
S
Selina Cho *
J
Jassim Happa
S
Sadie Creese
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976076delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The use of tacit knowledge has previously been shown to help expedite problem-solving procedures in the setting of medical emergency responses, as individuals can use past experiences in present and future challenges. However, there is a lack of understanding in its application in IT and socio-technical management. This paper examines the thought processes observed in Security Operational Centre (SOC) analysts facing threat events to lay the groundwork for tacit knowledge management in SOCs. Based on Sternberg's fieldwork in tacit knowledge, we conducted semi-structured interviews with ten analysts to explore the key artefacts and individual traits that aid their approach to communication, and to examine the thought processes under hypothetical incident handling scenarios. The results highlight a unanimous pursuit of Root Cause Analysis (RCA) upon the outbreak of an incident and stages of decision-making when escalating to third party support providers. Using Business Process Modelling and Notation (BPMN), we show the procedural elements of tacit knowledge from several scenarios. The results also suggest that simulation environments and physical proximity with analysts and vendors can facilitate the transfer of tacit knowledge more effectively in SOCs.
Keywords:
Security
Interviews
Task analysis
Knowledge management
Decision making
Licenses
Communication theory
DIKW
incident response
knowledge management
security operation center
sense-making
tacit knowledge
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

IEEE Access cover
IEEE Access
IF:
3.6
Papers:
9.8W
Citations:
29.4W

Organization

U
university of oxford
Scholars:
9.8W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 137
U
university of london
Scholars:
21.5W
Papers: 19.7W
Citations: 305