Return
Causal effects of multiple sclerosis therapies in left-truncated registry data
D
I
S
D
E
F
S
R
A
V
A
M
M
B
S
P
Y
V
M
A
S
B
J
M
M
O
N
A
M
W
A
H
V
A
R
S
D
E
D
R
G
C
M
E
M
R
J
A
S
J
T
M
A
T
T
S
B
Y
B
N
F
C
S
J
T
S
O
D
C
M
C
E
S
I
T
DOI:10.1177/13524585261459943.png)
Abstract
En 中文
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background:</jats:title>
<jats:p>Left-truncation is an unrecorded interval between multiple sclerosis (MS) onset and initial data in observational studies. This delay may bias estimates of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) effectiveness, especially when determined by patient or disease characteristics.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Objectives:</jats:title>
<jats:p>To examine whether causal effect estimates of DMTs over the full disease course can be reliably derived from left-truncated registry data.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Methods:</jats:title>
<jats:p>We analysed data from MSBase (144 centres, 41 countries) to assess the impact of left-truncation on causal treatment effect estimates. Cox marginal structural models (MSMs) estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for relapses, disability worsening and improvement, considering left-truncation at random and not-at-random. Fixed-time truncation and multivariable adjustment were applied to remediate bias.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results:</jats:title>
<jats:p>The study included 5588 patients tracked from true MS onset. The null model, without left-truncation, estimated the DMT effect on relapse risk (HR = 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54–0.77). Left-truncation inflated this estimate. Shorter random truncation (1 year) produced greater bias (HR = 0.34), decreasing with longer durations (3-year HR = 0.48). Truncation not-at-random biased relapse estimates (HR = 0.37). Disability outcomes were less sensitive.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title>
<jats:p>MSMs can reliably estimate DMT effectiveness in left-truncated MS registry data, although accuracy depends on truncation mechanism and duration. Both random and not-at-random truncation impact relapse estimates. Disability outcomes appear less sensitive. Fixed-time truncation and covariate adjustment mitigated bias.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
Journal
IF:
5
Papers:
5.4K
Citations:
1.4W

