arrow
Return

Causal Inference in Generalizable Environments: Systematic Representative Design

delete2020-01-04
delete19
delete
OA
AI
L
Lynn C. Miller *
S
Sonia Jawaid Shaikh
D
David C. Jeong
L
Liyuan Wang
T
Traci K. Gillig
C
Carlos Gustavo Godoy
P
Paul Robert Appleby
C
Charisse L’Pree Corsbie-Massay
S
Stacy Marsella
J
John L. Christensen
S
Stephen J. Read
DOI:10.1080/1047840X.2019.1693866delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Causal inference and generalizability both matter. Historically, systematic designs emphasize causal inference, while representative designs focus on generalizability. Here, we suggest a transformative synthesis - Systematic Representative Design (SRD) - concurrently enhancing both causal inference and built-in generalizability by leveraging today's intelligent agent, virtual environments, and other technologies. In SRD, a default control group (DCG) can be created in a virtual environment by representatively sampling from real-world situations. Experimental groups can be built with systematic manipulations onto the DCG base. Applying systematic design features (e.g., random assignment to DCG versus experimental groups) in SRD affords valid causal inferences. After explicating the proposed SRD synthesis, we delineate how the approach concurrently advances generalizability and robustness, cause-effect inference and precision science, a computationally-enabled cumulative psychological science supporting both bigger theory and concrete implementations grappling with tough questions (e.g., what is context?) and affording rapidly-scalable interventions for real-world problems.
Keywords:
Brunswik
cause and effect
experimental design
games
generalizability
representative design
systematic design
systematic representative design
virtual environments
virtual reality
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Psychological Inquiry cover
Psychological Inquiry
IF:
4.1
Papers:
989
Citations:
7.0K

Organization

U
university of southern california
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 51
U
University of Connecticut
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 2.5W
U
university of glasgow
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 37
S
Syracuse University
Scholars:
5.4K
Papers: 5.2K
Citations: 8.3K
W
washington state university
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 114
researcher View more organizations