.png){kind=icon}
Return
Causation does not explain contextuality
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.22331/q-2018-05-18-63.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Realist interpretations of quantum mechanics presuppose the existence of elements of reality that are independent of the actions used to reveal them. Such a view is challenged by several no-go theorems that show quantum correlations cannot be explained by non-contextual ontological models, where physical properties are assumed to exist prior to and independently of the act of measurement. However, all such contextuality proofs assume a traditional notion of causal structure, where causal influence flows from past to future according to ordinary dynamical laws. This leaves open the question of whether the apparent contextuality of quantum mechanics is simply the signature of some exotic causal structure, where the future might affect the past or distant systems might get correlated due to non-local constraints. Here we show that quantum predictions require a deeper form of contextuality: even allowing for arbitrary causal structure, no model can explain quantum correlations from non-contextual ontological properties of the world, be they initial states, dynamical laws, or global constraints.
Keywords:
HIDDEN-VARIABLES
TIME MACHINE
QUANTUM
RETROCAUSALITY
SPACETIMES
Journal
IF:
5.4
Papers:
951
Citations:
1.0W
Organization
Cited Papers
Operational approach to open dynamics and quantifying initial correlations.png)
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
OAAI
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSIF3.9
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more