.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
CD8+ T-Cell Memory: The Why, the When, and the How
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1101/cshperspect.a038661.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The generation of effective adaptive T-cell memory is a cardinal feature of the adaptive immune system. The establishment of protective T-cell immunity requires the differentiation of CD8(+) T cells from a naive state to one where pathogen-specific memory CD8(+) T cells are capable of responding to a secondary infection more rapidly and robustly without the need for further differentiation. The study of factors that determine the fate of activated CD8(+) T cells into either effector or memory subsets has a long history. The advent of new technologies is now providing new insights into how epigenetic regulation not only impacts acquisition and maintenance of effector function, but also the maintenance of the quiescent yet primed memory state. There is growing appreciation that rather than distinct subsets, memory T-cell populations may reflect different points on a spectrum between the starting naive T-cell population and a terminally differentiated effector CD8(+) T-cell population. Interestingly, there is growing evidence that the molecular mechanisms that underpin the rapid effector function of memory T cells are also observed in innate immune cells such as macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells. This raises an interesting hypothesis that the memory/effector T-cell state represents a default innate-like response to antigen recognition, and that it is the naive state that is the defining feature of adaptive immunity. These issues are discussed.
Keywords:
EPIGENETIC LANDSCAPES
LINEAGE RELATIONSHIP
SECONDARY EXPANSION
RECALL RESPONSES
NAIVE
EFFECTOR
CD4(+)
REPERTOIRE
DIFFERENTIATION
PHENOTYPE
Journal
IF:
10.1
Papers:
3.0K
Citations:
1.3W