arrow
Return

cegpy: Modelling with chain event graphs in Python

delete2023-08-01
delete5
delete
OA
AI
A
Aditi Shenvi *
P
Peter Strong
K
Katarzyna Kobalczyk
DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110615delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Chain event graphs (CEGs) are a recent family of probabilistic graphical models that generalise the popular Bayesian networks (BNs) family. Crucially, unlike BNs, a CEG is able to embed, within its graph and its statistical model, asymmetries exhibited by a process. These asymmetries might be in the conditional independence relationships or in the structure of the graph and its underlying event space. Structural asymmetries are common in many domains, and can occur naturally (e.g. a defendant vs prosecutor's version of events) or by design (e.g. a public health intervention). Whilst two CEG packages exist in R for modelling processes with asymmetric conditional independencies, there currently exists no software that allows a user to leverage the theoretical developments of the CEG model family in modelling processes with structural asymmetries. In this paper, we present cegpy: the first Python implementation of CEGs and the first across all languages to support structurally asymmetric processes. cegpy contains an implementation of Bayesian learning and probability propagation algorithms for CEGs. We illustrate the functionality of cegpy using a structurally asymmetric dataset.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords:
Chain event graphs
Staged trees
Event trees
Graphical models
Asymmetric processes
Context-specific independence
Python
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

K
Knowledge-Based Systems
IF:
7.6
Papers:
1.2W
Citations:
4.5W

Organization

U
University of Warwick
Scholars:
2.2W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 85