.png){kind=icon}
Return
Centric relation: A needed reference position
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/jopr.13603.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Purpose Centric relation (CR) is a universally recognized term and an acceptable reference position with a long history of success. The problem is that there is little consensus as to its definition or the method of recording it, and this has created an uprising to abolish it. Methods A review of pertinent literature related to its definition, method of recording, anatomic considerations, and long-standing principles was conducted. Results Centric relation is an established term but there are valid concerns over its definition and method of recording. There is consensus on using it as a restorative position in a patient in need of full-arch reconstruction, and there is no substantive clinical research to contradict this. If a clinician decides to use a different position, it should have a different name. Conclusions Centric relation is a reproducible reference position that can be utilized for diagnostic and restorative dental procedures with substantial scientific evidence to support that premise. There are numerous well-documented techniques, all of which are intermaxillary, that can replicate the position. There is little scientific evidence to support a premise as to where the exact position of the condyle should be in relation to the fossa.
Keywords:
centric relation
definition
interocclusal records
prosthodontic rehabilitation
use
Journal
J
IF:
3.6
Papers:
2.4K
Citations:
6.7K
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSaveShareSaveTectonic rotations on the leading edge of South America: The Bolivian orocline revisited.png)
Geology
GeologyIF0
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveThe magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of condylar new bone remodeling after Yang's TMJ arthroscopic surgerySCIENTIFIC REPORTS
OAAI
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSIF3.9
OAAIShareSave
View more