.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Challenges in Evaluating Technological Interventions for Affect Regulation
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3175687.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
We evaluated whether a vibrotactile breathing pacer would influence two measures of affect during a cognitive stressor. In particular, we examined whether changes in breathing would be evident, and if so, whether these would mediate the effects of breathing pacer on self-report anxiety and skin conductance. Our results were surprising: although we observed the expected effects on breathing, we were unable to demonstrate that changes in breathing parameters were responsible for the observed changes in self-report anxiety. In addition, we failed to show that the pacer had an impact on skin conductance. In this paper, we investigate why we did not observe the expected effects. We believe our negative results have implications for evaluating technological interventions for affect regulation.
Keywords:
Affect
affect regulation
anxiety
convergent cross mapping
empirical mode decomposition
fast fourier transform
haptic
linear mixed model
mediation
pacer
respiration
skin conductance
slow-paced breathing
vibrotactile
wearable
Journal
IF:
9.8
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
9.1K