arrow
Return

Changing Time Representation in Microsimulation Models

delete2025-02-25
delete0
PRE
AI
E
Eric Wong
W
Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
J
Joanna E. M. Sale
A
Andrea C. Tricco
S
Sharon E. Straus
D
David Naimark *
DOI:10.1177/0272989X251319808delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background In microsimulation models of diseases with an early, acute phase requiring short cycle lengths followed by a chronic phase, fixed short cycles may lead to computational inefficiency. Examples include epidemic or resource constraint models with early short cycles where long-term economic consequences are of interest for individuals surviving the epidemic or ultimately obtaining the resource. In this article, we demonstrate methods to improve efficiency in such scenarios. Furthermore, we show that care must be taken when applying these methods to epidemic or resource constraint models to avoid bias.Methods To demonstrate efficiency, we compared the model runtime among 3 versions of a microsimulation model: with short fixed cycles for all states (FCL), with dynamic cycle length (DCL) defined locally for each state, and with DCL features plus a discrete-event-like hybrid component. To demonstrate bias mitigation, we compared discounted lifetime costs for 3 versions of a resource constraint model: with a fixed horizon where simulation stops, with a fixed entry horizon beyond which new individuals could not enter the model, and with a fixed entry horizon plus a mechanism to maintain a constant level of competition for the resource after the horizon.Results The 3 versions of the microsimulation model had average runtimes of 515 (95% credible interval [CI]: 477 to 545; FCL), 2.70 (95% CI: 1.48 to 2.92; DCL), and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.26 to 2.61; DCL-pseudo discrete event simulation) seconds, respectively. The first 2 resource constraint versions underestimated costs relative to the constant competition version: $20,055 (95% CI: $19,000 to $21,120), $27,030 (95% CI: $24,680 to $29,412), and $33,424 (95% CI: $27,510 to $44,484), respectively.Limitations The magnitude of improvements in efficiency and reduction in bias may be model specific.Conclusion Changing time representation in microsimulation may offer computational advantages.
Keywords:
microsimulation
discrete event simulation
hybrid models
open parallel models
computational efficiency

Journal

Medical Decision Making cover
Medical Decision Making
IF:
2.3
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
6.4K

Organization

U
university of toronto
Scholars:
14.8W
Papers: 12.0W
Citations: 165
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

The Half-Cycle Correction Revisited: Redemption of a Kludge
err2013-09-18
err34
PREAI
errNaimark, David M. J.; Kabboul, Nader N.; Krahn, Murray D.
errShare
errSave
Clinical decision analysis of elective delivery vs expectant management for pregnant individuals with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome
err2022-11-01
err5
errOAAI
errResende, Maura H. Ferrari; Yarnell, Christopher J.; D'Souza, Rohan; Lapinsky, Stephen E.; Nam, Austin; Shah, Vibhuti; Whittle, Wendy; Wright, Julie K.; Naimark, David M. J.
errShare
errSave
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Changing Cycle Lengths in State-Transition Models: Challenges and Solutions
err2016-07-10
err43
errOAAI
errChhatwal, Jagpreet; Jayasuriya, Suren; Elbasha, Elamin H.
errShare
errSave
Modeling Using Discrete Event Simulation: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-4
err2012-09-18
err170
errOAAI
errKarnon, Jonathan; Stahl, James; Brennan, Alan; Caro, J. Jaime; Mar, Javier; Moller, Jorgen
errShare
errSave
State-Transition Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-3
err2012-09-18
err301
PREAI
errSiebert, Uwe; Alagoz, Oguzhan; Bayoumi, Ahmed M.; Jahn, Beate; Owens, Douglas K.; Cohen, David J.; Kuntz, Karen M.
errShare
errSave
no more