arrow
Return

Chisel bits cutting force estimation using XGBoost and different optimization algorithms

delete2024-08-01
delete0
PRE
AI
M
Mohammad Rouhani
E
Ebrahim Farrokh *
DOI:10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106465delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The design and selection of tools for mechanized excavations is a crucial topic in the field of tunneling. Chisel bits are commonly used tools for soft ground, with the required cutting force being a vital factor in tool design. However, current methods either lack accuracy or fail to consider all necessary parameters. To address this issue, a new cutting force prediction model was developed to improve response quality and consider the most effective parameters. 206 data points were collected from studies on rock cutting with different strength, including information such as Uniaxial compressive strength, Brazilian tensile strength, Depth, Width, Rake angle, and clearance angle. Five different algorithms were then used to optimize the Hyperparameters in the XGBoost method, including Grid Search, Random Search, Bayesian Algorithm, Differential Evolution, and Optuna. Results showed that while most algorithms provided appropriate responses, the Grid Search and Bayesian Algorithm methods were the most effective, with R 2 values (in test and train) of 0.876 and 0.93 in GS and 0.872 and 0.926 in BO, respectively. Upon comparison of the two methods, it was discovered that the GS approach yields a superior solution; however, it is also more sensitive to tuning, requires more calculations, and takes longer to provide a solution. When assessing the newly presented approach against existing methods, it was noted that the Evans and Roxborough methods produced R 2 values of 0.48 and 0.53, respectively, which are notably lower than those of the new method. Lastly, the parametric analysis revealed that the cutting force is primarily affected by the depth, width, and rake angle in that order.
Keywords:
Cutting force
Chisel bit
XGBoost
Grid search
Bayesian algorithm

Journal

Computers and Geotechnics cover
Computers and Geotechnics
IF:
6.2
Papers:
7.2K
Citations:
2.9W

Organization

A
Amirkabir University of Technology
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 1.0W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

State-of-the-art review of soft computing applications in underground excavations
err2020-07-01
err367
errOAAI
errZhang, Wengang; Zhang, Runhong; Wu, Chongzhi; Goh, Anthony Teck Chee; Lacasse, Suzanne; Liu, Zhongqiang; Liu, Hanlong
errShare
errSave
Experimental Study on Sandstone Rock Cutting with Chisel Picks
err2021-01-01
err6
PREAI
errOuyang, Yiping; Chen, Xinquan; Yang, Qi; Xu, Yongfu; Qiu, Yiping
errShare
errSave
Experimental study of photonic crystals consisting ofϵ-negative andμ-negative materials
err2006-11-30
err0
PREAI
errLiwei Zhang; Yewen Zhang; Li He; Hongqing Li; Hong Chen
errShare
errSave
A hybrid memory-based dragonfly algorithm with differential evolution for engineering application
err2020-02-14
err26
PREAI
errDebnath, Sanjoy; Baishya, Srimanta; Sen, Debarati; Arif, Wasim
errShare
errSave
Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization
err2016-01-01
err3.5K
PREAI
errShahriari, Bobak; Swersky, Kevin; Wang, Ziyu; Adams, Ryan P.; de Freitas, Nando
errShare
errSave
Fire and biodiversity
err2010-01-01
err0
PREAI
errDavid M.J.S Bowman; Brett P. Murphy
errShare
errSave
researcher View more