1
Return

Chitosan–Alginate Polyelectrolyte Systems: From Classical Release Models to the D-PARMO Framework

delete2026-05-18
delete0
delete
OA
AI
P
Parastoo Rekab *
A
Akeem Adeyemi Oladipo *
DOI:10.1002/mame.70232delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Despite the extensive preclinical optimization of biocompatible chitosan–alginate (CS/ALG) polyelectrolyte complexes for drug delivery, their clinical translation is hindered by a lack of predictive models linking formulation parameters to in vivo performance. This review bridges this “predictive gap” by critically deconstructing the physicochemical foundations of CS/ALG systems. We highlight the inadequacy of classical semi-empirical models (e.g., Higuchi, Korsmeyer-Peppas), which rely on descriptive curve-fitting rather than a priori prediction. To overcome this, we introduce the Dual-Polyelectrolyte Adaptive Release Mechanistic Outlook (D-PARMO). This novel framework mechanistically unifies the key coupled phenomena governing release: dual-polymer ionization equilibria, Flory-Rehner swelling, Donnan partitioning, and multi-modal transport kinetics. We condense this into an operational model that translates release data into physically meaningful parameters: a diffusion rate constant (kd), erosion/swelling amplitude and rate (ke, ks), and an electrostatic coupling coefficient (α). Comparative simulations demonstrate that D-PARMO successfully identifies underlying physical drivers where classical models fail. Adopting this mechanistically informed operational framework provides a rational, science-based pathway to support the design and de-risk the translation of smart biomaterials.
Keywords:
clinical translation
controlled release
D-PARMO
drug delivery
nanocarriers
polyelectrolyte complex
predictive modeling

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING cover
MACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING
IF:
4.6
Papers:
4.1K
Citations:
9.5K

Organization

E
Eastern Mediterranean University
Scholars:
1.6K
Papers: 1.8K
Citations: 2.0K
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers