arrow
Return

CHOP: Bypassing runtime bounds checking through convex hull Optimization

delete2020-03-01
delete2
delete
OA
AI
Y
Yurong Chen *
H
Hongfa Xue
T
Tian Lan
G
Guru Venkataramani
DOI:10.1016/j.cose.2019.101708delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Unsafe memory accesses in programs written using popular programming languages like C/C++ have been among the leading causes for software vulnerability. Prior memory safety checkers such as Soft-Bound enforce memory spatial safety by checking if every access to array elements are within the corresponding array bounds. However, it often results in high execution time overhead due to the cost of executing the instructions associated with bounds checking. To mitigate this problem, redundant bounds check elimination techniques are needed. In this paper, we propose CHOP, a Convex Hull Optimization based framework, for bypassing redundant memory bounds checking via profile-guided inferences. In contrast to existing check elimination techniques that are limited by static code analysis, our solution leverages a model-based inference to identify redundant bounds checking based on runtime data from past program executions. For a given function, it rapidly derives and updates a knowledge base containing sufficient conditions for identifying redundant array bounds checking. We evaluate CHOP on real-world applications and benchmark (such as SPEC) and the experimental results show that on average 80.12% of dynamic bounds check instructions can be avoided, resulting in improved performance up to 95.80% over SoftBound. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords:
Memory safety
Convex hull
Bounds check
Runtime optimization
LLVM
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

C
Computers and Security
IF:
5.4
Papers:
4.6K
Citations:
1.4W

Organization

G
George Washington University
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 1.7W