.png){kind=icon}
Return
Chromoendoscopy
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.029.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of gastrointestinal endoscopy. An evidence-based method is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the related articles feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases data from randomized controlled trials are lacking In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by I or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided For this review the MEDLINE database was searched through September 2006 for articles and references within related to endoscopic tissue staining by using the keywords chromoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and endoscopy paired with acetic acid, congo red, crystal violet, indigo carmine, lugol's, methylene blue, 'phenol red, and toluidine blue. Practitioners should continue to monitor the medical literature for subsequent data about the efficacy, safety, and socioeconomic aspects of these technologies. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.
Keywords:
MAGNIFICATION-CHROMOSCOPIC-COLONOSCOPY
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA
SPECIALIZED INTESTINAL METAPLASIA
EARLY ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
CONGO RED TEST
HIGH-RESOLUTION CHROMOENDOSCOPY
HELICOBACTER-PYLORI INFECTION
BLUE-DIRECTED BIOPSIES
ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
7.5
Papers:
2.7W
Citations:
2.4W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
ShareSaveChromoencloscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: A prospective study.png)
ENDOSCOPY
ENDOSCOPYIF12.8
PREAI
ShareSaveFlat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UKLANCET
LANCETIF88.5
PREAI
ShareSaveToluidine blue staining identifies high-risk primary oral premalignant lesions with poor outcomeCANCER RESEARCH
OAAI
CANCER RESEARCHIF16.6
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more