.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Clarifying managerial biases using a probabilistic framework
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100333.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
A unifying probabilistic framework is developed to analyze and compare the impact of the psychological biases of overconfidence and underconfidence on managerial perceptions about the expected value, overall risk, downside risk, value-at-risk and expected shortfall of decision-making economic variables. The results depict that overconfident managers overestimate their expected values and underestimate downside risk, VaR and ES of decision-making variables. Underconfident managers, on the other hand, underestimate their expected values and overestimate downside risk, value-at-risk, and expected shortfall. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Downside risk
Expected shortfall
Probability miscalibration
Psychological biases
Skewed normal distribution
Value-at-risk
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
4.7
Papers:
691
Citations:
3.3K