arrow
Return

Classifying thermodynamic cloud phase using machine learning models

delete2025-10-16
delete0
delete
OA
AI
L
Lexie Goldberger
M
Maxwell Levin
C
C.J. Harris
A
Andrew Geiss
M
Matthew D. Shupe
D
Damao Zhang *
DOI:10.5194/amt-18-5393-2025delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Vertically resolved thermodynamic cloud-phase classifications are essential for studies of atmospheric cloud and precipitation processes. The Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Thermodynamic Cloud Phase (THERMOCLDPHASE) value-added product (VAP) uses a multi-sensor approach to classify the thermodynamic cloud phase by combining lidar backscatter and depolarization, radar reflectivity, Doppler velocity, spectral width, microwave-radiometer-derived liquid water path, and radiosonde temperature measurements. The measured pixels are classified as ice, snow, mixed phase, liquid (cloud water), drizzle, rain, and liq_driz (liquid+drizzle). We use this product as the ground truth to train three machine learning (ML) models to predict the thermodynamic cloud phase from multi-sensor remote sensing measurements taken at the ARM North Slope of Alaska (NSA) observatory: a random forest (RF), a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and a convolutional neural network (CNN) with a U-Net architecture. Evaluations against the outputs of the THERMOCLDPHASE VAP with 1 year of data show that the CNN outperforms the other two models, achieving the highest test accuracy, F1 score, and mean intersection over union (IOU). Analysis of ML confidence scores shows that ice, rain, and snow have higher confidence scores, followed by liquid, while mixed, drizzle, and liq_driz have lower scores. Feature importance analysis reveals that the mean Doppler velocity and vertically resolved temperature are the most influential data streams for ML thermodynamic cloud-phase predictions. Lidar measurements exhibit lower feature importance due to rapid signal attenuation caused by the frequent presence of persistent low-level clouds at the NSA site. The ML models' generalization capacity is further evaluated by applying them at another Arctic ARM site in Norway using data taken during the ARM Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment (COMBLE) field campaign. The models demonstrated similar performance to that observed at the NSA site. Finally, we evaluate the ML models' response to simulated instrument outages and signal degradation and show that a CNN U-Net model trained with input channel dropouts performs better when input fields are missing.
Keywords:
ARCTIC CLOUD
OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS
ICE
STRATOCUMULUS
LIQUID
IMPACT
LAYER
RAIN

Journal

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques cover
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
IF:
3.3
Papers:
5.4K
Citations:
1.6W

Organization

A
alabama state university
Scholars:
292
Papers: 238
Citations: 2
U
united states department of energy (doe)
Scholars:
11.3W
Papers: 9.6W
Citations: 246
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
err2015-11-18
err0
PREAI
errOlaf Ronneberger; Philipp Fischer; Thomas Brox
errShare
errSave
The contribution of cloud and radiation anomalies to the 2007 Arctic sea ice extent minimum
err2008-04-22
err0
PREAI
errJennifer E. Kay; Tristan L'Ecuyer; Andrew Gettelman; Graeme Stephens; Chris O'Dell
errShare
errSave
The mixed-phase Arctic cloud experiment
err2007-02-01
err291
errOAAI
errVerlinde, J.; Harrington, J. Y.; McFarquhar, G. M.; Yannuzzi, V. T.; Avramov, A.; Greenberg, S.; Johnson, N.; Zhang, G.; Poellot, M. R.; Mather, J. H.; Turner, D. D.; Eloranta, E. W.; Zak, B. D.; Prenni, A. J.; Daniel, J. S.; Kok, G. L.; Tobin, D. C.; Holz, R.; Sassen, K.; Spangenberg, D.; Minnis, P.; Tooman, T. P.; Ivey, M. D.; Richardson, S. J.; Bahrmann, C. P.; Shupe, M.; DeMott, P. J.; Heymsfield, A. J.; Schofield, R.
errShare
errSave
Regime-Specific Cloud Vertical Overlap Characteristics From Radar and Lidar Observations at the ARM Sites
err2023-03-18
err2
errOAAI
errBalmes, Kelly A.; Sedlar, Joseph; Riihimaki, Laura D.; Olson, Joseph B.; Turner, David D.; Lantz, Kathleen
errShare
errSave
Sub‐Seasonal Forecasting With a Large Ensemble of Deep‐Learning Weather Prediction Models
err2021-07-16
err0
errOAAI
errJonathan A. Weyn; Dale R. Durran; Rich Caruana; Nathaniel Cresswell‐Clay
errShare
errSave
researcher View more