Return
Coiling of lugworm feces reveals universal mechanics for the shape of poo
M
N
D
DOI:10.1038/s41467-026-72566-7.png)
Abstract
En 中文
The coiling of animal excreta has fascinated naturalists since Darwin’s detailed observations of earthworm castings, yet the underlying physics remains poorly understood. We investigate lugworm (Arenicola marina) fecal castings as a natural system where soft biological material is extruded upward against gravity from subsurface burrows, spontaneously creating coiled morphologies. Through field observations at Roscoff, France, rheological measurements, controlled experiments, and theoretical modeling, we demonstrate that such “anti-gravitational” biological coiling follows the gravitational regime of elastic rope coiling theory, for which the coil radius is $$R \sim {({d}^{2}E/\rho g)}^{1/3}$$, where E is Young’s modulus, d is the rope diameter, ρ is the rope density, and g is the gravitational acceleration. Using data from lugworm feces, a synthetic analog (pea dough), and spaghetti and rice noodle controls, we find $$R \sim {({d}^{2}E/\rho g)}^{0.31\pm 0.03}$$, in quantitative agreement with mechanical theory. This contrasts with typical downward defecation in most animals, which transitions from the gravitational regime to an elastic (kinematical) regime as the fall height to the top of the pile decreases. Our findings provide a quantitative mechanical framework for understanding fecal morphology and reveal how directional differences in waste disposal create fundamentally different buckling regimes across the animal kingdom. Coiled animal excreta have fascinated naturalists since Darwin’s observations of earthworm castings, yet the physics are poorly understood. Authors study lugworm feces to provide a mechanical framework for fecal shape and how waste disposal in animals creates distinct buckling regimes.
Keywords:
lugworm feces
coiling morphology
gravitational regime
elastic rope theory
fecal shape
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
15.7
Papers:
9.2W
Citations:
91.2W

