arrow
Return

COMAP Early Science. III. CO Data Processing

delete2022-07-13
delete16
delete
OA
AI
M
Marie Kristine Foss *
H
H. T. Ihle
K
Kieran Cleary
H
H. K. Eriksen
S
Stuart Harper
J
Junhan Kim
J
James W. Lamb
J
J. G. S. Lunde
L
Liju Philip
M
Maren Rasmussen
N
Nils-Ole Stutzer
B
Bade Uzgil
D
Duncan J. Watts
I
I. K. Wehus
T
Thomas Zentmeyer
J
J. Richard Bond
P
Patrick C. Breysse
S
S. Church
D
Dongwoo T. Chung
C
C. L. Dickinson
D
Delaney A. Dunne
T
T. Gaier
J
Joshua Ott Gundersen
R
R. W. Hobbs
C
Charles R. Lawrence
N
Norman Murray
A
A. C. S. Readhead
H
Hamsa Padmanabhan
T
T. J. Pearson
T
Thomas J. Rennie
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ac63cadelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We describe the first-season CO Mapping Array Project (COMAP) analysis pipeline that converts raw detector readouts to calibrated sky maps. This pipeline implements four main steps: gain calibration, filtering, data selection, and mapmaking. Absolute gain calibration relies on a combination of instrumental and astrophysical sources, while relative gain calibration exploits real-time total-power variations. High-efficiency filtering is achieved through spectroscopic common-mode rejection within and across receivers, resulting in nearly uncorrelated white noise within single-frequency channels. Consequently, near-optimal but biased maps are produced by binning the filtered time stream into pixelized maps; the corresponding signal bias transfer function is estimated through simulations. Data selection is performed automatically through a series of goodness-of-fit statistics, including chi (2) and multiscale correlation tests. Applying this pipeline to the first-season COMAP data, we produce a data set with very low levels of correlated noise. We find that one of our two scanning strategies (the Lissajous type) is sensitive to residual instrumental systematics. As a result, we no longer use this type of scan and exclude data taken this way from our Season 1 power spectrum estimates. We perform a careful analysis of our data processing and observing efficiencies and take account of planned improvements to estimate our future performance. Power spectrum results derived from the first-season COMAP maps are presented and discussed in companion papers.
Keywords:
POWER SPECTRUM
TOMOGRAPHY
FORECASTS
EMISSION
MODEL
1ST

Journal

Astrophysical Journal cover
Astrophysical Journal
IF:
5.4
Papers:
8.3W
Citations:
32.0W

Organization

C
California Institute of Technology
Scholars:
2.9W
Papers: 2.5W
Citations: 4.9W
J
jodrell bank centre for astrophysics
Scholars:
2.1K
Papers: 1.8K
Citations: 2
S
Stanford University
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.2W
Citations: 17.0W
N
national aeronautics & space administration (nasa)
Scholars:
3.1W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 46
U
university of oslo
Scholars:
4.2W
Papers: 3.5W
Citations: 53
N
nasa jet propulsion laboratory (jpl)
Scholars:
6.9K
Papers: 5.3K
Citations: 14
N
national radio astronomy observatory (nrao)
Scholars:
2.6K
Papers: 2.9K
Citations: 3
U
University of Manchester
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 5.2W
Citations: 7.4W
U
university of toronto
Scholars:
14.7W
Papers: 12.0W
Citations: 165
researcher View more organizations