.png){kind=icon}
Return
Comments are welcome
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1007/s11192-022-04267-z.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Scholars present their new research at seminars and conferences and send drafts to peers in hopes of receiving comments and suggestions that will improve the quality of their work. Using a dataset of projects that were initiated when authors were doing their doctoral studies, this article measures how much peers' individual and collective comments improve the quality of research. Controlling for the quality of the research idea and author, I find that a one-standard-deviation increase in the number of peers' individual and collective comments is associated with a 43% increase in the quality of the journal in which the project is published.
Keywords:
Economics
Peer effects
Research seminars
Science of science
Journal
IF:
3.5
Papers:
8.1K
Citations:
2.2W
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSave
ShareSaveShareSaveThe importance of circulating and presenting manuscripts: Evidence from the accounting literature.png)
ACCOUNTING REVIEW
ACCOUNTING REVIEWIF4.4
PREAI
ShareSaveExperimental and theoretical values of the ultrasonic properties of dispersions: effect of particle state and size distributionUltrasonics
UltrasonicsIF0
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more