.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Comparative DNA Methylation Profiling of Human and Murine ALK-Positive B-Cell Neoplasms
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
S
R
S
C
S
W
C
S
M
S
C
W
L
O
A
A
R
R
DOI：10.1002/gcc.70060.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Structural genomic variants leading to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusions and aberrant expression of the ALK tyrosine kinase are the hallmark of subtypes of T- and B-lineage neoplasms, namely ALK-positive anaplastic large lymphoma (ALCL) and ALK-positive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). The latter is a rare aggressive lymphoma, which has been initially identified as a variant of diffuse LBCL (DLBCL) with plasmablastic features. Here, we performed comparative DNA methylation profiling of human and murine ALK-positive B-cell neoplasms. Array-based DNA methylation data from ALK-positive LBCL samples of eight patients were compared to that of DLBCL (n = 75), multiple myeloma (MM, n = 24), ALK-positive ALCL (n = 12) and normal B-cell populations (n = 93). ALK-positive LBCLs share a distinct DNA methylation signature similar to that of MM, characterized by lower global DNA methylation levels compared to DLBCLs and normal B-cell populations. DNA methylation alterations in ALK-positive LBCL were predominantly located in heterochromatic and polycomb-repressed regions. The epigenetic age and relative proliferative history of ALK-positive LBCL were intermediate between MM and DLBCL. B-cell neoplasms in NPM::ALK transgenic mice showed a similar hypomethylated signature when compared to normal murine B cells. Cross-species comparison indicated conservation of chromatin states and pathways affected by hypomethylation. Together, the findings suggest that in line with their phenotypical appearance human and murine ALK-positive B-cell lymphomas share an epigenetic profile more closely resembling that of plasma cell neoplasias than that of DLBCLs.
Keywords:
ALK-positive LBCLs
DNA methylation
transgenic mouse model
Journal
IF:
2.8
Papers:
3.3K
Citations:
4.7K
Organization
Cited Papers