Return
Comparative performance of selected mathematical programming models
DOI:10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00107-5.png)
Abstract
En 中文
This study compares the predictive performance of several mathematical programming models. Using the cropping patterns, yields and crop gross margins of 18 farms over a period of 5 years we compare the models' optimum solutions with observed crop distributions after the Reform of the EU Common Agricultural Policy of 1992. The results show that the best prediction corresponds to a model that includes expected profit and a qualitative measure of crop riskiness. The results suggest that, in order to obtain reliable predictions, the modelling of farmers' responses to policy changes must consider the risk associated with any given cropping pattern. Finally, we test the ability of the proposed model to reproduce the farmers' observed behaviour with equally good performance under conditions of limited data availability. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
model performance
mathematical programming
modelling
decision-making
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
6.1
Papers:
4.0K
Citations:
1.4W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS TO FARM-PLANNING - A CASE-STUDY
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
IF6.1
Empirical models of farmer behaviour using psychological, social and economic variables. Part II: Nonlinear and expert modelling
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
IF6.1
Effects of the measures envisaged in Agenda 2000 on arable crop producers and beef and veal producers:: an application of Positive Mathematical Programming to representative farms of a Spanish region
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
IF6.1

