.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Comparative Structural and Functional Analysis of Micronized Collagen-Based Scaffolds
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
S
M
A
A
S
Y
R
H
N
X
I
D
B
DOI：10.1177/19373341251396168.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Micronized collagen-based bioscaffolds are increasingly used in clinical applications for wound repair and soft tissue regeneration. This study compared the structural properties of four different commercially available micronized products derived from either reconstituted collagen (pRC), urinary bladder matrix (pUBM), or ovine forestomach matrix (mOFM, mOFM mu). The test articles were characterized by laser diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), packing density, differential scanning calorimetry, rheometry, proteolytic stability, agarose gel electrophoresis, and blood clotting index. Particle size and surface morphology, assessed by laser diffraction, SEM, and micro-CT, revealed marked differences in particle size, shape, and aggregation. Packing density ranged from 80.3 +/- 2.7 mg/cm3 (mOFM) to 484.7 +/- 17.8 mg/cm3 (pRC). Thermal analysis demonstrated the native structure of the OFM-based test articles (Tm, 59.80 +/- 0.11 degrees C and 58.15 +/- 0.15 degrees C) relative to pUBM and pRC (Tm, 41.06 +/- 0.06 degrees C and 40.59 +/- 0.23 degrees C). Rheological testing revealed that mOFM and mOFM mu had increased cohesive energy, indicating better mechanical resilience when the micronized materials were rehydrated to form a paste. The OFM-based test articles exhibited the greatest resistance to proteolytic digestion (T1/2, 12.730 +/- 1.232 and 5.759 +/- 0.1296). All the test articles, except for the reconstituted collagen product, demonstrated hemostasis in whole blood. Micronized reconstituted collagen showed immediate dissolution and no fluid absorption, hemostasis, or resistance to proteolytic digestion, whereas micronized OFM showed the greatest proteolytic stability and packing density. Substantial differences among the micronized bioscaffolds were revealed from the analysis, most likely due to their different source materials and manufacturing processes. Careful consideration of these parameters is warranted when selecting a micronized product for soft tissue applications. Impact Statement This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of four commercially available micronized collagen-based bioscaffolds, highlighting substantial differences in their structural and mechanical properties. Our findings suggest that bioscaffolds derived from the native extracellular matrix, particularly ovine forestomach matrix, exhibit superior proteolytic stability, mechanical cohesion, and hemostasis compared with the products made from reconstituted collagen. These differences are likely driven by the source material and processing method and underscore the critical importance of material selection in clinical applications. This work advances the understanding of bioscaffold performance and informs evidence-based decision-making.
Keywords:
micronized extracellular matrix
ovine forestomach matrix
urinary bladder matrix
collagen
Journal
IF:
2.9
Papers:
3.4K
Citations:
7.4K
Organization
Cited Papers