Comparing and experimenting machine learning techniques for code smell detection

Francesca Arcelli Fontana

doi:10.1007/s10664-015-9378-4

Return

Comparing and experimenting machine learning techniques for code smell detection

2015-06-06

277

PRE

Francesca Arcelli Fontana

Mika Mäntylä

Marco Zanoni *

Alessandro Marino

DOI：10.1007/s10664-015-9378-4

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

Several code smell detection tools have been developed providing different results, because smells can be subjectively interpreted, and hence detected, in different ways. In this paper, we perform the largest experiment of applying machine learning algorithms to code smells to the best of our knowledge. We experiment 16 different machine-learning algorithms on four code smells (Data Class, Large Class, Feature Envy, Long Method) and 74 software systems, with 1986 manually validated code smell samples. We found that all algorithms achieved high performances in the cross-validation data set, yet the highest performances were obtained by J48 and Random Forest, while the worst performance were achieved by support vector machines. However, the lower prevalence of code smells, i.e., imbalanced data, in the entire data set caused varying performances that need to be addressed in the future studies. We conclude that the application of machine learning to the detection of these code smells can provide high accuracy (>96 %), and only a hundred training examples are needed to reach at least 95 % accuracy.

Keywords:

Code smells detection

Machine learning techniques

Benchmark for code smell detection

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.