arrow
Return

Computer-based rating method for evaluating multiple visual stimuli on multiple scales

delete2008-09-01
delete1
PRE
AI
Y
Yaliang Chuang *
L
Linlin Chen
DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2007.08.003delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
In this research, two joint evaluation rating methods (focus-on-attribute and drag-and-drop) and a separate evaluation rating method (focus-on-stimulus) are proposed for rating multiple visual stimuli with respect to multiple scales. All three interactive methods incorporate a real-time adjusting mechanism, allowing respondents to interactively adjust their ratings. Using the traditional paper-and-pencil method as the basis for comparison, the performance of these computer-based rating methods and the proposed real-time adjusting mechanism were investigated. First, it was found that the computer-based methods not only produced results equivalent to those produced by the paper-and-Pencil method, but also improved the data quality by preventing the occurrence of missing values and allowing respondents to adjust their scores. Second, the two joint evaluation methods performed better than the separate evaluation method in terms of usage experience, test-retest reliability, and the likelihood of simulating the daily shopping experience, in which multiple consumer products are often compared simultaneously. Of the two joint evaluation methods, the drag-and-drop method received better subjective evaluations than the focus-on-attribute method. Third, the proposed real-time adjusting mechanism was found to obtain better subjective satisfaction in rating. In summary, for measuring multiple visual stimuli with multiple scales, the computer-based joint evaluation rating methods using a real-time adjusting mechanism were found to be better choices among the measurement tools investigated. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
joint evaluation
separate evaluation
comparative rating
real-time adjustment
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Computers in Human Behavior cover
Computers in Human Behavior
IF:
8.9
Papers:
9.1K
Citations:
5.8W

Organization

N
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 2.2W
N
national taiwan university of science & technology
Scholars:
8.8K
Papers: 8.7K
Citations: 9
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Materials to Resist Wear—A Guide to their Selection and Use
err1987-04-01
err0
errOAAI
errA. R. Lansdown; A. L. Price; Jorn Larsen-Basse
errShare
errSave
Manifestation of intrinsic defects in optical properties of self-organized opal photonic crystals
err2000-05-01
err0
PREAI
errYu. A. Vlasov; V. N. Astratov; A. V. Baryshev; A. A. Kaplyanskii; O. Z. Karimov; M. F. Limonov
errShare
errSave
Quercetin Alleviates Pulmonary Fibrosis in Silicotic Mice by Inhibiting Macrophage Transition and TGF-β-Smad2/3 Pathway
err2023-04-05
err0
errOAAI
errFei Geng; Lan Zhao; Yuhao Cai; Ying Zhao; Fuyu Jin; Yaqian Li; Tian Li; Xinyu Yang; Shifeng Li; Xuemin Gao; Wenchen Cai; Na Mao; Ying Sun; Hong Xu; Zhongqiu Wei; Fang Yang
errShare
errSave
researcher View more