arrow
Return

Consciousness explained or described?

delete2022-01-21
delete17
delete
OA
AI
A
Aaron Schurger *
M
Michael S. A. Graziano
DOI:10.1093/nc/niac001delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Consciousness is an unusual phenomenon to study scientifically. It is defined as a subjective, first-person phenomenon, and science is an objective, third-person endeavor. This misalignment between the means-science-and the end-explaining consciousness-gave rise to what has become a productive workaround: the search for 'neural correlates of consciousness' (NCCs). Science can sidestep trying to explain consciousness and instead focus on characterizing the kind(s) of neural activity that are reliably correlated with consciousness. However, while we have learned a lot about consciousness in the bargain, the NCC approach was not originally intended as the foundation for a true explanation of consciousness. Indeed, it was proposed precisely to sidestep the, arguably futile, attempt to find one. So how can an account, couched in terms of neural correlates, do the work that a theory is supposed to do: explain consciousness? The answer is that it cannot, and in fact most modern accounts of consciousness do not pretend to. Thus, here, we challenge whether or not any modern accounts of consciousness are in fact theories at all. Instead we argue that they are (competing) laws of consciousness. They describe what they cannot explain, just as Newton described gravity long before a true explanation was ever offered. We lay out our argument using a variety of modern accounts as examples and go on to argue that at least one modern account of consciousness, attention schema theory, goes beyond describing consciousness-related brain activity and qualifies as an explanatory theory.
Keywords:
theory
law
attention schema theory
HOTT
GNWT
IIT
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

N
Neuroscience of Consciousness
IF:
4.3
Papers:
290
Citations:
889

Organization

C
CEA
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 62
C
chapman university system
Scholars:
1.7K
Papers: 1.4K
Citations: 2
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Neuroscience - Consciousness and complexity
errSCIENCE
IF45.8
err1998-12-04
err1.1K
PREAI
errTononi, G; Edelman, GM
errShare
errSave
Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis
errNEURON
IF15
err2020-03-01
err485
errOAAI
errMashour, George A.; Roelfsema, Pieter; Changeux, Jean-Pierre; Dehaene, Stanislas
errShare
errSave
Understanding large‐scale, complex, human–environmental processes: a framework for social–ecological observatories
err2018-05-07
err0
errOAAI
errPatrick Bourgeron; Andrew Kliskey; Lilian Alessa; Henry Loescher; Kinga Krauze; Arika Virapongse; David L Griffith
errShare
errSave
What Is Consciousness?
errNATURE
IF48.5
err2018-05-09
err60
errOAAI
errKoch, Christof
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Blindsight in man and monkey
errBRAIN
IF11.7
err1997-03-01
err347
errOAAI
errStoerig, P; Cowey, A
errShare
errSave
Attention control and the attention schema theory of consciousness
err2020-12-01
err21
errOAAI
errWilterson, Andrew I.; Kemper, Casey M.; Kim, Noah; Webb, Taylor W.; Reblando, Alexandra M. W.; Graziano, Michael S. A.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more