arrow
Return

Consequences of sample size, variable selection, and model validation and optimisation, for predicting classification ability from analytical data

delete2006-12-01
delete139
PRE
AI
R
Richard G. Brereton *
DOI:10.1016/j.trac.2006.10.005delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This article discusses problems of validating classification models especially in datasets where sample sizes are small and the number of variables is large. It describes the use of percentage correctly classified (%CC) as an indicator for success of a classification model. For small datasets, %CC should not be used uncritically and its interpretation depends on sample size. It illustrates the use of a common classification method, discriminant partial least squares (D-PLS) on a randomly generated dataset of 200 samples and 200 variables. An aim of the classifier is to determine whether the null hypothesis (there is no distinction between two classes) can be rejected. Autoprediction gives an 84.5% CC. it is shown that, if there is variable selection, it must be performed independently on the training set to obtain a CC close to 50% on the test set; otherwise, over-optimistic and false conclusions can be reached about the ability to classify samples into groups. Finally, two aims of determining the quality of a model are frequently confused, namely optimisation (often used to determine the most appropriate number of components in a model) and independent validation; to overcome this, the data should be split into three groups. There are often difficulties with model building if validation and optimisation have been done on different groups of samples, especially using iterative methods, each group being modelled using properties, such as a different number of components or different variables. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
classification model
discriminant partial least squares
D-PLS
optimisation
percentage correctly classified
validation
%CC
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

TRAC-Trends in Analytical Chemistry cover
TRAC-Trends in Analytical Chemistry
IF:
12
Papers:
7.3K
Citations:
3.9W

Organization

No organization information available
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

A phase 3 trial of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer.
err2017-05-20
err0
PREAI
errWillemien Van Driel; Karolina Sikorska; Jules Schagen van Leeuwen; Henk Schreuder; Ralph Hermans; Ignace de Hingh; Jacobus Van Der Velden; Henriëtte J.G. Arts; Massuger Leon; Arend Aalbers; Verwaal Victor J.; Koen van der Vijver; Neil K Aaronson; Gabe S. Sonke
errShare
errSave
The Mahalanobis distance
err2000-01-01
err1.9K
PREAI
errDe Maesschalck, R; Jouan-Rimbaud, D; Massart, DL
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait
err2003-06-01
err0
PREAI
errBruce A. MacWilliams; Matthew Cowley; Diane E. Nicholson
errShare
errSave