arrow
Return

Construct Validity in Software Engineering

delete2023-03-01
delete23
delete
OA
AI
D
Dag I. K. Sjøberg *
G
Gunnar R. Bergersen
DOI:10.1109/TSE.2022.3176725delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Empirical research aims to establish generalizable claims from data. Such claims may involve concepts that must be measured indirectly by using indicators. Construct validity is concerned with whether one can justifiably make claims at the conceptual level that are supported by results at the operational level. We report a quantitative analysis of the awareness of construct validity in the software engineering literature between 2000 and 2019 and a qualitative review of 83 articles about human-centric experiments published in five high-quality journals between 2015 and 2019. Over the two decades, the appearance in the literature of the term construct validity increased sevenfold. Some of the reviewed articles we reviewed employed various ways to ensure that the indicators span the concept in an unbiased manner. We also found articles that reuse formerly validated constructs. However, the articles disagree about how to define construct validity. Several interpret construct validity excessively by including threats to internal, external, or statistical conclusion validity. A few articles also include fundamental challenges of a study, such as cheating and misunderstanding of experiment material. The diversity of topics included as threats to construct validity calls for a more minimalist approach. Based on the review, we propose seven guidelines to improve how construct validity is handled and reported in software engineering.
Keywords:
Software engineering
Systematics
Software measurement
Guidelines
Complexity theory
Object oriented modeling
Marine vehicles
Measurement
research quality
empirical research
systematic review
guidelines

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering cover
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IF:
5.6
Papers:
2.9K
Citations:
1.1W

Organization

U
university of oslo
Scholars:
4.2W
Papers: 3.5W
Citations: 53
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Membrane-bound domain of HMG CoA reductase is required for sterol-enhanced degradation of the enzyme
errCell
IF0
err1985-05-01
err0
PREAI
errGregorio Gil; Jerry R. Faust; Daniel J. Chin; Joseph L. Goldstein; Michael S. Brown
errShare
errSave
Towards a reduction in architectural knowledge vaporization during agile global software development
err2019-08-01
err27
errOAAI
errBorrego, Gilberto; Moran, Alberto L.; Palacio, Ramon R.; Vizcaino, Aurora; Garcia, Felix O.
errShare
errSave
CHARACTERISTICS OF APPLICATION SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
err1978-06-01
err198
errOAAI
errLIENTZ, BP; SWANSON, EB; TOMPKINS, GE
errShare
errSave
Evaluating the extension mechanisms of the knowledge discovery metamodel for aspect-oriented modernizations
err2019-03-01
err4
PREAI
errSantos, Bruno M.; Landi, Andre de S.; Santibanez, Daniel S.; Durelli, Rafael S.; de Camargo, Valter V.
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Sonic hedgehog mutations are an uncommon cause of developmental eye anomalies
err2010-04-13
err0
PREAI
errPreeti Bakrania; Sibel A. Ugur Iseri; Alexander W. Wyatt; Dave J. Bunyan; Wayne W.K. Lam; Alison Salt; Jacqueline Ramsay; David O. Robinson; Nicola K. Ragge
errShare
errSave
researcher View more