logo
CanyamAI summaries for academic research
language
MobileMobile
  • Phone FeatureWeChat Mini Program
EnglishEnglish
noticeNotice
BlogBlog
delete
arrow
Return

Constructivism and development: Reply to Smith's commentary

delete1998-06-01
delete3
PRE
AI
U
Ulrich Müller *
B
Bryan W. Sokol
W
Willis F. Overton
DOI：10.1006/drev.1997.0455delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
This article is a reply to the commentary made by Smith (1998) regarding these authors' earlier article (1998), which proposes a modified constructivist account of the origins of mental representation. This article focuses on three aspects of Smith's commentary. First, we elaborate on Smith's discussion of differences between empiricist and constructivist approaches to development. Second, we discuss Smith's restatement of Piaget's position in terms of four levels of representational capacities. Finally, we reply to specific comments directed by Smith at our article. (C) 1998 Academic Press.

Journal

Developmental Review cover
Developmental Review
IF:
5.6
Papers:
889
Citations:
5.4K

Organization

No organization information available