arrow
Return

Context Label Learning: Improving Background Class Representations in Semantic Segmentation

delete2023-06-01
delete1
delete
OA
AI
李泽榉 (Zeju Li) *
K
Konstantinos Kamnitsas
C
Cheng Ouyang
陈晨 (Chen Chen)
B
Ben Glocker
DOI:10.1109/TMI.2023.3242838delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background samples provide key contextual information for segmenting regions of interest (ROIs). However, they always cover a diverse set of structures, causing difficulties for the segmentation model to learn good decision boundaries with high sensitivity and precision. The issue concerns the highly heterogeneous nature of the background class, resulting in multi-modal distributions. Empirically, we find that neural networks trained with heterogeneous background struggle to map the corresponding contextual samples to compact clusters in feature space. As a result, the distribution over background logit activations may shift across the decision boundary, leading to systematic over-segmentation across different datasets and tasks. In this study, we propose context label learning (CoLab) to improve the context representations by decomposing the background class into several subclasses. Specifically, we train an auxiliary network as a task generator, along with the primary segmentation model, to automatically generate context labels that positively affect the ROI segmentation accuracy. Extensive experiments are conducted on several challenging segmentation tasks and datasets. The results demonstrate that CoLab can guide the segmentation model to map the logits of background samples away from the decision boundary, resulting in significantly improved segmentation accuracy. Code is available at https://github.com/ZerojumpLine/CoLab.
Keywords:
Image segmentation
Tumors
Task analysis
Liver
Kidney
Context modeling
Training
Underfitting
multi-task learning
self-supervised learning
image segmentation

Journal

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging cover
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
IF:
9.8
Papers:
6.2K
Citations:
3.7W

Organization

I
Imperial College London
Scholars:
8.3W
Papers: 7.3W
Citations: 11.1W