arrow
Return

Cooperative learning for multiview analysis

delete2022-09-12
delete26
delete
OA
AI
D
Daisy Yi Ding
S
Shuangning Li
B
Balasubramanian Narasimhan
R
Robert Tibshirani *
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2202113119delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We propose a method for supervised learning with multiple sets of features (views). The multiview problem is especially important in biology and medicine, where -omics data, such as genomics, proteomics, and radiomics, are measured on a common set of samples. Cooperative learning combines the usual squared-error loss of predictions with an agreement penalty to encourage the predictions from different data views to agree. By varying the weight of the agreement penalty, we get a continuum of solutions that include the well-known early and late fusion approaches. Cooperative learning chooses the degree of agreement (or fusion) in an adaptive manner, using a validation set or cross-validation to estimate test set prediction error. One version of our fitting procedure is modular, where one can choose different fitting mechanisms (e.g., lasso, random forests, boosting, or neural networks) appropriate for different data views. In the setting of cooperative regularized linear regression, the method combines the lasso penalty with the agreement penalty, yielding feature sparsity. The method can be especially powerful when the different data views share some underlying relationship in their signals that can be exploited to boost the signals. We show that cooperative learning achieves higher predictive accuracy on simulated data and real multiomics examples of labor-onset prediction. By leveraging aligned signals and allowing flexible fitting mechanisms for different modalities, cooperative learning offers a powerful approach to multiomics data fusion.
Keywords:
data fusion
multiomics
supervised learning
sparsity
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

P
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IF:
9.1
Papers:
10.8W
Citations:
73.5W

Organization

S
Stanford University
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.2W
Citations: 17.0W