Return
Coordinating to avoid the catastrophe
DOI:10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102977.png)
Abstract
En 中文
Tipping pointsfor dangerous climate damages can transform climate protection into a coordination problem. If the location of the threshold is known, Nash equilibria exist in which the catastrophe is averted even without a climate agreement. However, there usually exists also an equilibrium in which no country exerts effort to prevent it, and the catastrophe occurs. We model equilibrium selection among non -cooperative countries with the help of an external randomization device, and analyze how it affects coalition formation. We find that results are much more nuanced than in the case where non -cooperative countries always coordinate on preventing the catastrophe. In some cases, a coalition of free-ridersforms that is detrimental to welfare. In other cases, a threshold equilibriumemerges in which coalition members commit to do more than the outsiders, and the coalition is just large enough to become active. The grand coalition is also an equilibrium outcome, but is often unstable towards deviations by groups of countries.
Keywords:
Climate catastrophe
Tipping point
Climate cooperation
Coordination game
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
5.9
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
1.2W
Organization
Cited Papers
The Power of Focal Points Is Limited: Even Minute Payoff Asymmetry May Yield Large Coordination Failures
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW
IF11.6
Role of Src family kinase in the rewarding effect and hyperlocomotion induced by morphine
NeuroReport
IF0

