arrow
Return

Crack identification using smart paint and machine learning

delete2023-04-24
delete7
PRE
AI
S
Said Quqa
S
Sijia Li
Y
Yening Shu
L
Luca Landi
K
Kenneth J. Loh *
DOI:10.1177/14759217231167823delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Information on the presence and location of cracks in civil structures can be precious to support operators in making decisions related to structural management and scheduling informed maintenance. This paper investigates the efficacy of supervised machine learning to solve the inverse electrical impedance tomography problem and to reconstruct the conductivity distribution of a piezoresistive sensing film. This film consists of a conductive paint applied onto structural components, and operators can use its conductivity distribution to identify crack sizes and locations in the underlying structure. A deep neural network is employed to reconstruct a dense conductivity distribution within the painted area by using only voltage measurements collected at sparse boundary locations. Since one of the most challenging aspects of using supervised learning tools for real-world applications is generating a representative training dataset, this paper presents a new approach to test the suitability of synthetic datasets built using a finite element model of the sensing film. Results are reported for four sensing specimens fabricated with two different techniques (i.e., using carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets, respectively). Crack-like damage is induced to the substrate of the sensing film and identified using the proposed machine learning technique. Promising results are obtained as compared to conventional methods.
Keywords:
Carbon nanotube
damage identification
damage localization
electrical impedance tomography
graphene
smart coating
structural health monitoring

Journal

S
Structural Health Monitoring-An International Journal
IF:
5.7
Papers:
2.3K
Citations:
1.1W

Organization

University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.5W
Papers: 33.7W
Citations: 6.6K
U
University of Bologna
Scholars:
4.5W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 4.1W