arrow
Return

CRISPR-BETS: a base-editing design tool for generating stop codons

delete2021-11-02
delete22
delete
OA
AI
Y
Yuechao Wu
Y
Yao He
S
Simon Sretenovic
S
Shishi Liu
Y
Yanhao Cheng
Y
Yangshuo Han
G
Guanqing Liu
Y
Yu Bao
Q
Qing Fang
郑雪莲 cover
郑雪莲 (Xuelian Zheng)
J
Jianping Zhou
Y
Yiping Qi *
张勇 (Yong Zhang) *
张韬 (Tao Zhang) *
DOI:10.1111/pbi.13732delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Cytosine base editors (CBEs) can install a predefined stop codon at the target site, representing a more predictable and neater method for creating genetic knockouts without altering the genome size. Due to the enhanced predictability of the editing outcomes, it is also more efficient to obtain homozygous mutants in the first generation. With the recent advancement of CBEs on improved editing activity, purify and specificity in plants and animals, base editing has become a more appealing technology for generating knockouts. However, there is a lack of design tools that can aid the adoption of CBEs for achieving such a purpose, especially in plants. Here, we developed a user-friendly design tool named CRISPR-BETS (base editing to stop), which helps with guide RNA (gRNA) design for introducing stop codons in the protein-coding genes of interest. We demonstrated in rice and tomato that CRISPR-BETS is easy-to-use, and its generated gRNAs are highly specific and efficient for generating stop codons and obtaining homozygous knockout lines. While we tailored the tool for the plant research community, CRISPR-BETS can also serve non-plant species.
Keywords:
cytosine base editors
protospacer adjacent motif
guide RNA design
stop codons
plants
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Plant Biotechnology Journal cover
Plant Biotechnology Journal
IF:
10.5
Papers:
4.0K
Citations:
2.0W

Organization

University System of Maryland cover
University System of Maryland
Scholars:
6.4W
Papers: 5.6W
Citations: 113
Y
Yangzhou University
Scholars:
2.8W
Papers: 1.9W
Citations: 3.3W