.png){kind=icon}
Return
Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.003.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Zero-deforestation commitments are a type of voluntary sustainability initiative that companies adopt to signal their intention to reduce or eliminate deforestation associated with commodities that they produce, trade, and/or sell. Because each company defines its own zero-deforestation commitment goals and implementation mechanisms, commitment content varies widely. This creates challenges for the assessment of commitment implementation or effectiveness. Here, we develop criteria to assess the potential effectiveness of zero-deforestation commitments at reducing deforestation within a company supply chain, regionally, and globally. We apply these criteria to evaluate 52 zero-deforestation commitments made by companies identified by Forest 500 as having high deforestation risk. While our assessment indicates that existing commitments converge with several criteria for effectiveness, they fall short in a few key ways. First, they cover just a small share of the global market for deforestation-risk commodities, which means that their global impact is likely to be small. Second, biome-wide implementation is only achieved in the Brazilian Amazon. Outside this region, implementation occurs mainly through certification programs, which are not adopted by all producers and lack third-party near-real time deforestation monitoring. Additionally, around half of all commitments include zero-net deforestation targets and future implementation deadlines, both of which are design elements that may reduce effectiveness. Zero-net targets allow promises of future reforestation to compensate for current forest loss, while future implementation deadlines allow for preemptive clearing. To increase the likelihood that commitments will lead to reduced deforestation across all scales, more companies should adopt zero-gross deforestation targets with immediate implementation deadlines and clear sanction-based implementation mechanisms in biomes with high risk of forest to commodity conversion.
Keywords:
Agriculture
Forestry
Supply chain
Conservation
Voluntary environmental policies
Sustainability standards
Journal
G
IF:
9.1
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
2.6W
Organization
View more organizations
Cited Papers
Cattle vaccination records question the impact of recent zero-deforestation agreements in the AmazonOAAI
OAAIShareSaveTaking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries.png)
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICSIF6.3
PREAI
ShareSaveCritical need for new definitions of forest and forest degradation in global climate change agreementsCONSERVATION LETTERSOAAI
CONSERVATION LETTERSIF5.9
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveWhen is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restorationAMBIOOAAI
AMBIOIF5.1
OAAIShareSaveThe fructokinase from Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii belongs to group I fructokinase enzymes and is encoded separately from other carbohydrate metabolism enzymesMicrobiology
OAAI
MicrobiologyIF0
OAAIShareSaveRole of chromium sublayers in the growth of highly crystalline (111)-oriented gold films on sapphire
PREAI
ShareSave View more